<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ORACLE-BASE Blog Aggregator &#187; John Scott</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oracle-base.com/aggregator/author/john-scott/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/aggregator</link>
	<description>Blogs I follow...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Designing for 800×600?</title>
		<link>http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/2009/11/06/designing-for-800x600/</link>
		<comments>http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/2009/11/06/designing-for-800x600/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Scott</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve lost count of the number of times I&#8217;ve heard people say &#8220;The site must be designed to work in 800&#215;600 resolution&#8221;. Now there are a few cases where this definitely is a real requirement, however often it&#8217;s more of a case that people don&#8217;t want to potentially exclude people from their site (and if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve lost count of the number of times I&#8217;ve heard people say &#8220;The site must be designed to work in 800&#215;600 resolution&#8221;. Now there are a few cases where this definitely is a real requirement, however often it&#8217;s more of a case that people don&#8217;t want to potentially exclude people from their site (and if it&#8217;s a commercial site why wouldn&#8217;t you want to appeal to the widest possible audience?).</p>
<p>However, how many people really use an 800&#215;600 resolution these days? Out of interest I took a look at the statistics from my blog (the one you&#8217;re reading right now) for yesterday (I posted a new post yesterday so it would be interesting to see the stats for the new views just for yesterday rather than over the entire lifetime of the site).</p>
<p><a class="tt-flickr tt-flickr-Medium" title="Browser Resolutions" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/26705001@N00/4079469797/sizes/o/"><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3510/4079469797_5755690548.jpg" alt="Browser Resolutions" width="500" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>So, whilst I&#8217;m not trying to pretend that these figures are representative of any other sites out there. They highlight a couple of things to me.</p>
<p>1) Nobody visited my site using 800&#215;600 resolution.</p>
<p>2) The smallest resolution was 320&#215;396 (probably an iPhone or other mobile device). After that the next smallest was 1024&#215;768.</p>
<p>3) There are quite a lot of variations in browser resolution, more than I expected really.</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s my point here? Well&#8230;I don&#8217;t really have one&#8230;.other than -</p>
<p>1) Needing to support 800&#215;600 is very different to designing the site in 800&#215;600. In other words it&#8217;s no bad thing to have your site gracefully degrade to working nicely in 800&#215;600, but I certainly wouldn&#8217;t make the starting design 800&#215;600, otherwise you&#8217;d spending effort where there seems to be least reward.</p>
<p>2) 1024&#215;768 is now becoming over-shadowed by higher resolutions. Most laptops these days support higher resolutions than that, let alone desktops. Most developers I know have multiple monitors too.</p>
<p>So, don&#8217;t be afraid of challenging the requirement of &#8220;We must design for 800&#215;600&#8243;&#8230;how many people are *really* using it? Let&#8217;s stamp it out now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/2009/11/06/designing-for-800x600/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

