<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista SP1 and VMware Server 1.0.5&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/</link>
	<description>Oracle related rants (and lots of off-topic stuff)...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim...</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-93432</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-93432</guid>
		<description>Hi.

VMware Server 1.0.5 works fine with Vista as a host. I run it on my laptop all the time. I even do demos for presentations using this, so I know it works OK.

Raw devices are not supported in RHEL5 or its clones, which is why my article uses block devices, which have replaced raw devices.

http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/11g/OracleDB11gR1RACInstallationOnOEL5UsingVMware.php

I don't use Workstation 6, so I can't comment on the setup, but I know the configuration in this article works fine on VMware Server 1.0.5.

Cheers

Tim...

PS. If you are using 32 bit Windows, you only have access to about 3G of your 4G of memory. To use the extra gig you will need to switch to a 64 bit operating system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p>
<p>VMware Server 1.0.5 works fine with Vista as a host. I run it on my laptop all the time. I even do demos for presentations using this, so I know it works OK.</p>
<p>Raw devices are not supported in RHEL5 or its clones, which is why my article uses block devices, which have replaced raw devices.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/11g/OracleDB11gR1RACInstallationOnOEL5UsingVMware.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/11g/OracleDB11gR1RACInstallationOnOEL5UsingVMware.php</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t use Workstation 6, so I can&#8217;t comment on the setup, but I know the configuration in this article works fine on VMware Server 1.0.5.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tim&#8230;</p>
<p>PS. If you are using 32 bit Windows, you only have access to about 3G of your 4G of memory. To use the extra gig you will need to switch to a 64 bit operating system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-93431</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 09:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-93431</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim,

I am struggling with following combination 
- my host is Vista-32bit Home Premium (which is my new notebook come with 2cores, 4GB of RAM, and 250GB external HDD)
- installed VMWARE workstation 6 (the only vmw that certified on vista)
- Installed RHEL 5 (find out that raw device is no longer supported)
- Wanted to try ASM + 2 nodes of 11g RAC 
- VMWARE Workstation 6 unable to work with external storage (shared storage)

is my last option is VMWARE Server 2 beta?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim,</p>
<p>I am struggling with following combination<br />
- my host is Vista-32bit Home Premium (which is my new notebook come with 2cores, 4GB of RAM, and 250GB external HDD)<br />
- installed VMWARE workstation 6 (the only vmw that certified on vista)<br />
- Installed RHEL 5 (find out that raw device is no longer supported)<br />
- Wanted to try ASM + 2 nodes of 11g RAC<br />
- VMWARE Workstation 6 unable to work with external storage (shared storage)</p>
<p>is my last option is VMWARE Server 2 beta?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim...</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-93428</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 08:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-93428</guid>
		<description>Hi.

I guess you probably could use Workstation 6 for a RAC installation using the same procedure, but I've not done it, so I can't guess how well it will work.

Cheers

Tim...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p>
<p>I guess you probably could use Workstation 6 for a RAC installation using the same procedure, but I&#8217;ve not done it, so I can&#8217;t guess how well it will work.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tim&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-93369</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 08:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-93369</guid>
		<description>I am not seeing VMWARE certified VMware Server 1.0.5 on VISTA as host, can we use VMWARE Workstation 6 for Oracle RAC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not seeing VMWARE certified VMware Server 1.0.5 on VISTA as host, can we use VMWARE Workstation 6 for Oracle RAC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim...</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-90751</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-90751</guid>
		<description>OK. That will be why I don't see the problem. I already use AVG. :)

Cheers

Tim...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. That will be why I don&#8217;t see the problem. I already use AVG. <img src='http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tim&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emo</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-90655</link>
		<dc:creator>emo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-90655</guid>
		<description>I think I've solve my problem. I uninstall the Avast antivirus and the BSOD have gone. I installed AVG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ve solve my problem. I uninstall the Avast antivirus and the BSOD have gone. I installed AVG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim...</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-89646</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-89646</guid>
		<description>I'm running 1.05 on Vista SP1 with no worries. Maybe I've just been lucky so far. This is starting to scare me. :(

Cheers

Tim...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m running 1.05 on Vista SP1 with no worries. Maybe I&#8217;ve just been lucky so far. This is starting to scare me. <img src='http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tim&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emo</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-89642</link>
		<dc:creator>emo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-89642</guid>
		<description>Hi, I'm having the same problem, VMWare Server 1.05 on Vista SP1 and end up getting BSOD

Any help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m having the same problem, VMWare Server 1.05 on Vista SP1 and end up getting BSOD</p>
<p>Any help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-89462</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-89462</guid>
		<description>Anyone try VMWare Server 1.05 on Vista SP1 and end up getting BSOD with at STOP 7E?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone try VMWare Server 1.05 on Vista SP1 and end up getting BSOD with at STOP 7E?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim...</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-88071</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/03/19/vista-sp1-and-vmware-server-105/#comment-88071</guid>
		<description>Hi.

Sorry, I'm not a Windows admin. I'm just a user. I get bad network performance on Vista regardless of the Service Pack 1 installation. The built in zip functionality is also unusable. I have to use WinZip.

There are lots of complaints on the net about poor network performance in Vista. I guess it must be hard to fix because SP1 hasn't touched it from what I can see.

Cheers

Tim...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p>
<p>Sorry, I&#8217;m not a Windows admin. I&#8217;m just a user. I get bad network performance on Vista regardless of the Service Pack 1 installation. The built in zip functionality is also unusable. I have to use WinZip.</p>
<p>There are lots of complaints on the net about poor network performance in Vista. I guess it must be hard to fix because SP1 hasn&#8217;t touched it from what I can see.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tim&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
