Comments on: SecureFiles in Oracle 11g… http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/04/17/securefiles-in-oracle-11g/ Oracle related rants (and lots of off-topic stuff)... Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:43:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Aman.... http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/04/17/securefiles-in-oracle-11g/#comment-91690 Aman.... Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:14:14 +0000 http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/?p=552#comment-91690 Great! :-) I am waiting for it to get complete! Best regards Aman.... Great! :-) I am waiting for it to get complete!
Best regards
Aman….

]]> By: Tim... http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/04/17/securefiles-in-oracle-11g/#comment-91661 Tim... Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:30:42 +0000 http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/?p=552#comment-91661 Hi. It's on my to-do list. :) Cheers Tim... Hi.

It’s on my to-do list. :)

Cheers

Tim…

]]> By: Aman.... http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/04/17/securefiles-in-oracle-11g/#comment-91652 Aman.... Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:44:40 +0000 http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/?p=552#comment-91652 Hi sir, Very nice article. There are lot of enhancements in the stats gathering in 11g.If possible , can you write about the new additions in the dbms_stats, hash sampling algorithm instead of row based in the column statistics and all that please? It would be really great and simple to understand with your way.And its also a part of 11g OCP.:) Thanks and best regards Aman..... Hi sir,
Very nice article. There are lot of enhancements in the stats gathering
in 11g.If possible , can you write about the new additions in the dbms_stats, hash sampling algorithm instead of row based in the column statistics and all that please?
It would be really great and simple to understand with your way.And its also a part of 11g OCP.:)
Thanks and best regards
Aman…..

]]> By: Venzi http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/04/17/securefiles-in-oracle-11g/#comment-91551 Venzi Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:07:07 +0000 http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/?p=552#comment-91551 Hi Tim, I did a little performance test in some time ago. It's a very simple one I know but the results were a little bit impressive! Just check it out: http://venzi.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/11g-and-the-new-securefile-lob-data-type-simple-quick-test/ Regards Venzi Hi Tim,

I did a little performance test in some time ago. It’s a very simple one I know but the results were a little bit impressive! Just check it out: http://venzi.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/11g-and-the-new-securefile-lob-data-type-simple-quick-test/

Regards

Venzi

]]> By: Tim... http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/04/17/securefiles-in-oracle-11g/#comment-91469 Tim... Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:18:08 +0000 http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/?p=552#comment-91469 Hi. From a superficial perspective, it looks the same. Still the table, a lob index and the lob segment. I didn't do any performance testing as I'm running this on a virtual machine and the performance tests I've done in the past are questionable to say the least with this sort of setup. :) Cheers Tim... Hi.

From a superficial perspective, it looks the same. Still the table, a lob index and the lob segment.

I didn’t do any performance testing as I’m running this on a virtual machine and the performance tests I’ve done in the past are questionable to say the least with this sort of setup. :)

Cheers

Tim…

]]> By: Mathew Butler http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2008/04/17/securefiles-in-oracle-11g/#comment-91463 Mathew Butler Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:18:32 +0000 http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/?p=552#comment-91463 Hi Tim, I was interested to find out some details of the underlying objects that were created when using securefiles. But couldn't see any of this in the document. I'm talking about new objects in user_objects after creating a SECUREFILE LOB. I'm curious whether the underlying LOB implementation has changed significantly. Or whether this is a just a tweak to the existing LOB datatype structure. Of course, I can investigate myself. But thought that if you were inclined it might be a good addition to this doc. Also interested in SECUREFILE peformance, but I'll get to this when it looks like we get nearer to 11G. Regards, Hi Tim,

I was interested to find out some details of the underlying objects that were created when using securefiles. But couldn’t see any of this in the document. I’m talking about new objects in user_objects after creating a SECUREFILE LOB. I’m curious whether the underlying LOB implementation has changed significantly. Or whether this is a just a tweak to the existing LOB datatype structure.

Of course, I can investigate myself. But thought that if you were inclined it might be a good addition to this doc.

Also interested in SECUREFILE peformance, but I’ll get to this when it looks like we get nearer to 11G.

Regards,

]]>