<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The death of Itanium?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2009/12/18/the-death-of-itanium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2009/12/18/the-death-of-itanium/</link>
	<description>Oracle related rants (and lots of off-topic stuff)...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naresh</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2009/12/18/the-death-of-itanium/comment-page-1/#comment-116560</link>
		<dc:creator>Naresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/?p=1161#comment-116560</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response Tim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response Tim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim...</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2009/12/18/the-death-of-itanium/comment-page-1/#comment-116047</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/?p=1161#comment-116047</guid>
		<description>Hi.

The price/performance ratio has always been terrible compared to the regular chips. Yes they worked faster, but at what cost? Even back in the bad old Xeon days, I would have picked Xeons over Itanium if I could.

I&#039;ve spoken to some insiders at a well known vendor, who were the main proponents of Itanium, and they said it sucked, but it suited their business model.

I&#039;m sure lots of lessons were learned from it as a technology, but  IA-64 never took off and now the latest batch of X86-64 processors blow them out of the water, so the end is nigh... :)

Cheers

Tim...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p>
<p>The price/performance ratio has always been terrible compared to the regular chips. Yes they worked faster, but at what cost? Even back in the bad old Xeon days, I would have picked Xeons over Itanium if I could.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spoken to some insiders at a well known vendor, who were the main proponents of Itanium, and they said it sucked, but it suited their business model.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure lots of lessons were learned from it as a technology, but  IA-64 never took off and now the latest batch of X86-64 processors blow them out of the water, so the end is nigh&#8230; <img src='http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tim&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naresh</title>
		<link>http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2009/12/18/the-death-of-itanium/comment-page-1/#comment-116025</link>
		<dc:creator>Naresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/?p=1161#comment-116025</guid>
		<description>Why do you say Itanium is not a good idea? I have no particular opinion about Itanium - just curious why you say so. I hope the answer is simple enough to repsond to a comment :).

Thanks,
Naresh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you say Itanium is not a good idea? I have no particular opinion about Itanium &#8211; just curious why you say so. I hope the answer is simple enough to repsond to a comment <img src='http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Naresh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

